Five Beer Articles You Need To Read And Why, 4/25/16

Sorry, I’ve been absent again, but working 12-14 hours a day, on your feet, for 4 days in a row takes its toll and I really needed to sleep.  Anyway, there are three blog posts coming in the next 2 weeks.  One of which will probably be a multipart post because it is a big subject I am going to try and tackle.  The other are a continuation of my fascination and exploration of creativity and a fundamental question about everything I’m writing about on this blog.

  • Many if not most states in the union are in the midst of changing many of their alcohol laws. Most of these laws are left over from Prohibition and some even date back to when the country was still a group of colonies. Most of these changes are slapdash and piecemeal. Look at how most of the laws concerning growlers are not part of a larger look at beer is sold in a state, but just a law to fulfill a niche in a market.  New York is the first one that I’ve noticed take a hard and systematic look at its laws and how they should be changed.
  • Here is another case of brewers wanting to change the law specific to brewers. You know what would be great? If this state’s brewer guild took a few months and came up with a list of 5-10 legislative items and presented them to sympathetic state legislators telling them that if you can pass most if not all of these laws, we can guarantee a strong business segment that will generate tax revenue.  I’m just kind of tired of reading stories about brewers upset that they can’t sell growlers or sell beer in their taprooms.  These are all part of the same problem. Of course, a legislator in Oklahoma is trying to do that and she keeps getting hit in the face with 2x4s from self-interested lobbyists.
  • How much is too much when giving incentives to businesses to move to your state? That is a question NC has been trying to answer for years now in all business segments, not just beer.  I became interested in this topic a few years ago when a few professional sports teams moved because they couldn’t convince the cities and states they were in to pay to build them a new stadium.  Basically, the owners want cities and states to put up all the money for construction and infrastructure for a stadium the teams would control, including all the profits from ticket sales, parking, concessions, etc.  They would spout off about all these pie in the sky jobs created by the stadium, which had no basis in any economic fact, and hold cities ransom.  So, I have mixed feelings about states and municipalities giving away too many incentives for any business.  I think luring businesses with tax breaks is great up until the point where the municipality is no longer making money off the venture.
  • Here is look at the alcohol industry in Michigan. It is interesting to think about craft beer as a part of a larger craft alcohol business segment.  Again, instead of just trying to get growler and crowlers legal or getting the state to allow sales in brewery taprooms, it may help to position these things as part of a larger business segment that can have good tax revenue implications.
  • You know, I’ve felt like a character on Game of Thrones who goes around telling anyone who will listen, “Winter is coming.” I’ve been reading articles for almost 2 years now telling us that a hop shortage is coming and I’ve been writing about those articles in this space.  Yet, the craft beer world, by which I mean craft beer drinkers have been going along like this bounty of hoppy beer will continue without end. Here is another article explaining what is and what will probably happen.  What will probably happen? The price of your favorite double IPA is about to go up in the next few months if stays available at all.